Think of all the track and field meets you've been to over your lifetime. For me, I figure I've been to at least 200 meets over the past 15 years, whether it was as an athlete, coach, journalist or fan. Out of all those meets, I can honestly say that fewer than 20 were actually entertaining, and at the end of the day I could probably list a half dozen that were actually worth paying money for.
Part of the problem for our sport is that meets aren't entertaining. People don't want to come watch a track meet because there's very little going on outside of what's happening on the track, and few people actually understand who's competing and what good winning times are. It's a problem, one that is rarely addressed, but needs to be if our sport ever wants to become something greater than it currently is.
And the thing is, it all starts at the high school level. Think of a high school football or basketball game. Much of the town shows up to watch. There are bright lights shining down on the field or court, the school band plays up tempo songs, and everyone dresses in school colors to cheer on their school. Have you ever been to a track meet that is exciting as a prep football game on a Friday night?
So, for the sake of always hoping to push the sport forward in a positive direction, I've devised a list of ten ways track and field meets can become more entertaining. Please share your thoughts in the comment section.
1. Play Music - It might be the easiest thing to do to take a track meet to that next level. Every stadium in the U.S. most likely has a PA system, thus allowing you to play music before, during and after the meet. Not only does this entertain fans, providing sounds that might just get them more excited, but it also fills dead time between races, when announcers aren't necessarily announcing anything. And...it's ok to play music while a race is taking place.
2. Hire a Good Announcer - One of the easiest ways to squash a meet is to have an announcer that can't pronounce names, doesn't have a clue as to who's participating and generally doesn't understand the sport. There are always people in your community who could do a great job announcing and are knowledgable about the sport. Make sure to feed your announcer information a few days in advance so they can learn who's competing and what some of the great head to head action might be. Announcers that simply say what is taking place in the race aren't good announcers.
3. Reduce the Time - Can we all agree that most track and field meets are too long? Nothing is worse than sitting in the stands for 4 or 10 or 14 hours, watching a million athletes compete that you really don't care about. I understand that many meets are set up to include everyone, but do all the football players on the sidelines get to play in the varsity game each Friday night? The most exciting meets during the high school and college season are always the conference and championship events, which limit the amount of participants, thus limiting the amount of time that the event actually takes place. No pro or collegiate sporting event that actually draws fan takes longer than three hours.
4. Reduce the Events - At most track meets, at least 30 separate events take place. You figure there are 15-18 events per meet, then factor in boys and girls or men and women and multiple levels of competition, and right there you have a meet that is way too long and way too boring. If there is a 100m dash, does there really need to be a 200m dash? I understand that in certain situations all the events need to be covered, but for invitationals, do you really need that many events. Limiting the amount of races, only places more emphasis on each race, and the more emphasis you can have on certain match-ups, the greater the drama and the more likely the crowd will be interested in what's taking place.
5. Recruit Talent / Create Match-ups - There is nothing wrong with calling up a coach or an agent and asking if their athlete might be interested in taking part in the meet. In fact, why not do this? What do you have to lose? Creating great match-ups is what sport is all about. Head to head competition, with top athletes testing their talents against one another, it is what draws people to sports in the first place. The better the match-ups, the more fans will enjoy the meet.
6. Educate the Fan - Many people that attend track and field meets don't understand everything that is going on. They might understand the events, but odds are they don't know everyone competing or what good times are or who the top athletes in the meet are. Both prior to and during the event, meet directors should want to educate their fans on who's who in their event. Programs can accomplish a lot of this, having good announcers can accomplish this, while offering great pre-meet coverage is also a solid tool to educate the fan. The more they know, the more they can get excited about what the meet has to offer.
7. Pack the Stands - Excited energy creates more excited energy, which will build and build until the final event of the day. The more people you can fill the stands with, the more excitement the meet will have. Reaching out to the community, promoting the meet as a family event, but also as an exciting event, will hopefully draw more people, which will only increase the buzz. Sold out baseball games are much more exciting, even if the score is 1-0, than a baseball game where only a quarter of the stands are full.
8. Under the Lights - Evening sporting events are hands down more exciting than daytime sporting events. There's just something about having the lights shining down on the track and field events that creates an extra buzz. If the races are exciting enough, it can truly create a sense of euphoria that few other evening activities can match.
9. Offer More Than a Track Meet - A track meet that offers more than the meet itself is always a good thing. This is what made the Olympic Trials last summer so exciting. Track Town Plaza behind Hayward Field offered fans an opportunity to listen to live music, eat some good food, catch exciting offers from sponsors and talk it up with other track and field fans. Creating a festival-like setting is always a good thing, and fortunately, track meets are always held in stadiums, which offer plenty of space to put up some tents and offer something a little extra. The bigger the experience, the more exciting the event.
10. Be Cool - The "coolness" factor for track and field might be at an all-time low. It's not cool to be a track and field athlete in the eyes of most sporting fans, rather this is a niche sport that has very little to offer. Part of what makes a meet exciting is creating a "coolness" around the event. Pre-event promotions, getting the media involved, promoting it to a younger audience, etc. are all great ways to drive up the hype. Look at the most successful sports in the world. They are big time because they are cool. It's cool to wear a soccer jersey in Europe. It's cool to be a football fan in the U.S. So much of what makes a meet great is what happens before hand, but with the right moves that will only help an event become that much greater.
Monday, July 6, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

.jpg)
9 comments:
These are all good points, Scott, but there's one thing I'm tired of seeing: article after article and blog post after blog post of "how to fix track and field in the United States" or "how to make track more exciting" or whatever variation of that title you can come up with.
I propose the following challenge: No more "how to fix it," articles, let's just fix it! What do you say? I'm willing to do what I can to help with the cause. I feel that writing about it online isn't the best way to do that.
Will, while I agree with you to a certain degree, how do you propose going about fixing all the problems? I sent out my blog post today to many coaches and meet directors throughout the country that I know, as well as to USATF. I also asked everyone I sent it to, to forward it on to their friends and fellow meet directors. Reaching out is the key, and that's what I try to do with this blog. Every time I have a "how to" type piece I make sure to send it out.
Honestly, I feel it's up to USATF to make the change, or else it's up to "us" to create an organization that will help the sport significantly. So many meets are "sanctioned" by USATF that they have direct influence.
Also, I've been doing much of what I wrote about with my meet, the Midwest Distance Gala, which has grown into one of the premier post-season meets at the prep level in only five years, and is constantly out performing meets that have been around for decades. I am showing them a successful model, but I can tell you there has been major resistance to changing their meets to become better products.
If you don't write about it and email it out, how else do you propose changing the ways of the sport? I think this is a great conversation worth having. Thanks for the comments, Will.
Scott, great article. And I agree with you... the only way is to put it out there and keep pushing it AND try to live it out with your own meets like you are doing. Good job!
You and I talked on the phone about some other ideas and I'll probably call you soon to brainstorm some more with you. I hope to be part of the solution as well both with software I am developing (RaceTab), the web site (MileSplit), and my own meets I put on (flrunners.com Invitational for one).
Other ideas...
1 - Be more media friendly. Disney will produce video content themselves and send out links to download it to local TV stations, web sites, and newspapers that they can use. It's mainly raw videos that they could then use to edit together pieces but it could be pre-produced video that they can re-publish. Besides this press ready-to-print releases are huge. Also... just in general, make your meet accessible to media, get them information, feed them, don't make them pay for parking, etc. It will reap rewards and win you better coverage. I say this from being on both sides of the aisle.
2 - Make the meet more interactive. This can be done through the meet web site, inviting comments, chat, live updates/video/photos, live blogging, etc. And an idea that just came to me after reading this article that I think I'll create... live polling. What if you could poll the audience before the race, the announcer says who will win or asks a trivia question or whatever, and you text your answer in. It live updates the poll results or picks the winner!!
3 - Live scoring of races including team scores and splits. (more for cross country perhaps)
4 - Prizes and contests for the crowd. Man people love even just t-shirts... even if the t-shirts have ads on them. I got an ugly yellow t-shirt at a Magic game that said "Doctor Mecanico" and I was excited about it.
That's all I have time for but there are plenty of other things.
Keep it up, Scott.
I like most of these ideas, but I think the real drag at most meets is that there isn't a true element of competition. I enjoy going out to Stanford, which accomplishes at least half of these, to watching people run fast. But I'd much prefer watching people actually compete for something.
This is related to #5 in your post, but it goes beyond that. It's not just match-ups I want to see, it's rivalries, where athletes' performances matter across events. Dual meets and championship meets are the best not because of the quality of competition, but because every performance potentially matters.
Ultimately, this is what separates your prep football game from even a meet as big as the Adidas Classic. People in the town show up not just to watch, but to cheer and support a side. They care about the outcome for more than just entertainment reasons.
This idea is ridiculous, but what if invitationals like the Midwest Distance Gala had "team captains" who picked their teams, and everyone raced for points as well as times? Captains could be people from the community, athletes themselves, or maybe raffle off the chance to be one. You could maybe even get LetsRun, MileSplit, Dyestat, etc. to sponsor the teams. In any case, if 4 teams were out there with 4 different colored jerseys, it would make it fun to pick a side and cheer them on. And ultimately, it probably wouldn't even matter that it was completely arbitrary.
It's probably a logistical nightmare and the risks might outweigh the rewards. But give me a side to support and I'll get that much more engaged in a track meet.
@bryan I think you have an excellent point. And I think that one possibility Doug Logan has mentioned with the USATF is the possibility of having TEAMS like other sports. So it would be New York versus LA. Or Miami vs. Atlanta. So you'd have someone to root for and rivalries.
There is not much rivalry between team Nike and team Adidas that creates much fan excitement!
Of course promotion and possibly meet structures would have to be adjusted to actually bring importance to teams.
Scott,
I certainly commend you for your efforts with the Midwest Distance Gala. Being from Tennessee/Georgia, I haven't been able to get to that meet, but I can share instances of "things done right" in my area of the country.
Jasen Parks (admin of tn.milesplit.com) does an excellent job with the meets he hosts at his HS in making them fan-friendly. He announces the races, and field events, comparing them to track records and school records, over the PA system. He keeps the races moving along on a fixed schedule and follows the schedule to a T. A huge complaint I've heard from parents of runners in High School is that meets fall behind schedule. That's something he does right.
With regards to the USATF, I don't dispute that if they don't do something very soon--within the next 12-18 months, perhaps?--it's time for a revamp of the system. If that means ousting the USATF, then so be it. Doug Logan has talked a lot of smack about what he plans on doing, but I haven't seen much more than that. Meets like Pre become boring because they're chock-full of Nike athletes. How ridiculously hard to watch a race is it when everybody is wearing the same danged orange jersey!? (But I digress...) Then there's the Reebok Grand Prix, the whole thing was overshadowed by the presence--or lack thereof--of Usain Bolt. I feel that is entirely poor marketing by USATF. The meets do their part in bringing in the athletes, I say that it's USATF (or a new organization if the present one fails to step up) to do it's part and market the sport to the masses.
The point, however, of my original comment, is that I feel like this is the eleventyith thing I've read about how to make meets more entertaining. And I'm sure it's the first one you have written, but it seems like maybe all of these people writing these columns about making meets entertaining could get together and do more good as a group than as several people throwing their ideas out on the Internet.
Sorry for the exceptionally long comment that went off track at least four times.
This article needs to be a series - one full post per point; honestly, you should make a 21st century manual for meet directors.
Great! So it's settled... the four of us are starting a professional track & field league.
kThe professional athletes should mingle with the fans after the races.
Post a Comment